Agenda

9:00 AM - 9:20 AM - Check-in & Setup + Team Formation
Grab badges, meet other hackers

9:20 AM - 9:35 AM - Kickoff & Rules
Quick intro, overview of tracks + prizes

9:35 AM - 10:00 AM - Hosts Lightning Intros

10:00 AM - 2:45 PM - Build Session (5h 45m)
Main hacking time

2:45 PM - 3:00 PM - Submission Window
Submit: GitHub link, Cursor dashboard screenshot (MiniMax proof), recorded demo, short description, track(s)

3:00 PM - 5:00 PM - Demo Screening / Judge Shortlist / Finalist Live Pitches / Awards
2 min live demo + 1 min explanation + 1 min Q&A per team

Requirements

  • GitHub repo link (public)
  • Demo link
  • Recorded demo video (3 min max)
  • 2-3 sentence description & track(s)
  • To win any of the grand prizes: post project on a public LinkedIn/X with @MiniMax #DCCursorMiniMaxHackathon 

Hackathon Sponsors

Prizes

$3,000+ in prizes
+ other prizes
“AI That Does Work” - 1st place
$1,000 in cash
1 winner

$1000 + $500 of Cursor credits + each member receives 3 months of our Pro tier ($99/month) + 100M DeepInfra inference tokens

“AI That Does Work” - 2nd place
$750 in cash
1 winner

$750 + $500 of Cursor credits

“AI That Does Work” - 3rd place
$250 in cash
1 winner

$250 + $500 of Cursor credits

Best Project Built with ElevenLabs
1 winner

Each team member receives 6 months of our Scale tier ($330/month)

Best UI/UX built with 1 prompt
1 winner

$100 V0 credit to winners each (max team of 4)

/q99
$500 in cash
1 winner

/q99 Interview + $500 (company-specific challenge)

Best Finance Prize
$250 in cash
1 winner

Best Growth Engine
$250 in cash
1 winner

Devpost Achievements

Submitting to this hackathon could earn you:

Judges

Abu Jalloh

Abu Jalloh

Lucy Chen

Lucy Chen

Martin Sajon

Martin Sajon

Bill Collier

Bill Collier

Sam Koralnik

Brian McAbee

Julian Schoen

Abu

Lucy

Judging Criteria

  • Relevancy & Creativity (15%)
    How original and relevant is this project to the hackathon theme? Consider: Is the idea fresh, thoughtful, or approached in a novel way? Does it avoid being just a wrapper around text generation?
  • Technical Execution (40%)
    How well was the system actually built? Consider: Does the workflow execute real steps (not just generate text)? Does the system function end-to-end? Is the technical scope appropriate and well-executed?
  • Pitching Quality (10%)
    How clearly does the team explain the project? Consider: Is the problem and solution immediately clear? Does the demo flow logically? Can a non-expert understand what it does and why it matters?
  • Impact (25%)
    Does this project feel valuable beyond the hackathon? Consider: Would a real user want this? Could this be extended into a real product or tool? Does it meaningfully save time, effort, or cognitive load?
  • UX / UI Design (10%)
    How intentional and usable is the user experience? Consider: Is the UI simple, clear, and purposeful? Does the UX match the workflow? Is the system demo-able and understandable without explanation?

Questions? Email the hackathon manager

Tell your friends

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.