Edit imported docs to use the encyclopedic tone #23
Labels
No labels
bug
contribution welcome
docs wanted
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
upstream
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
redict/redict.io#23
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Some of the docs use informal language, first-person perspective, etc. Should be rewritten to use the encyclopedic tone.
I agree. I think the Streams documentation is an example of this informal style. Furthermore, I would also claim that this is a bit too much a “tutorial” to be the data type description for streams.