forgejo/website
34
33
Fork 45
Code Issues 28 Pull requests 4 Activity Actions

ci: switch from node:20 to oci:ci:1 #559

Merged
earl-warren merged 1 commit from mahlzahn/ci_switch_container into main 2025-02-11 23:16:48 +01:00 AGit
Conversation 5 Commits 1 Files changed 1 +1 -1
mahlzahn commented 2025-02-11 22:00:10 +01:00
Member
Copy link

Closes #558 (if working)

Closes #558 (if working)
ci: switch from node:20 to oci:ci:1
All checks were successful
pr / preview (pull_request_target) Successful in 1m32s
Details
040f555665
forgejo-website commented 2025-02-11 22:01:41 +01:00
Collaborator
Copy link

Preview ready: https://forgejo.codeberg.page/@pull_559/
https://forgejo.codeberg.page/@pull_559/2025-01-monthly-update/
https://forgejo.codeberg.page/@pull_559/2025-02-release-v10-0-1/

Preview ready: https://forgejo.codeberg.page/@pull_559/ https://forgejo.codeberg.page/@pull_559/2025-01-monthly-update/ https://forgejo.codeberg.page/@pull_559/2025-02-release-v10-0-1/
earl-warren commented 2025-02-11 23:17:54 +01:00
Contributor
Copy link

fingers crossed. Maybe linting should go to a separate job that does not require pull_request_target because there are no secrets involved, which would help debugging them before merging instead of after :-)

fingers crossed. Maybe linting should go to a separate job that does not require `pull_request_target` because there are no secrets involved, which would help debugging them before merging instead of after :-)
👍 1
earl-warren commented 2025-02-12 08:11:39 +01:00
Contributor
Copy link

https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/actions/runs/1256/jobs/0#jobstep-3-21 => worked 🎉

https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/actions/runs/1256/jobs/0#jobstep-3-21 => worked 🎉
viceice commented 2025-02-12 08:15:08 +01:00
Owner
Copy link

@earl-warren wrote in #559 (comment):

fingers crossed. Maybe linting should go to a separate job that does not require pull_request_target because there are no secrets involved, which would help debugging them before merging instead of after :-)

I suggest to split out the lint and typo check to separate workflow

@earl-warren wrote in https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/pulls/559#issuecomment-2813148: > fingers crossed. Maybe linting should go to a separate job that does not require `pull_request_target` because there are no secrets involved, which would help debugging them before merging instead of after :-) I suggest to split out the lint and typo check to separate workflow
👍 1
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
earl-warren
Labels
Clear labels   
404

Broken links or missing content

  
Accessibility

Accessibility

  
Blog post

   
Documentation

Forgejo Documentation

  
Internationalisation

i18n and l10n

  
User research - Accessibility

Requires input about accessibility features, likely involves user testing.

  
User research - Blocked

Do not pick as-is! We are happy if you can help, but please coordinate with ongoing redesign in this area.

  
User research - community

Community features, such as discovering other people's work or otherwise feeling welcome on a Forgejo instance.

  
User research - Config (instance)

Instance-wide configuration, authentication and other admin-only needs.

  
User research - Errors

How to deal with errors in the application and write helpful error messages.

  
User Research - Filters

How filter and search is being worked with.

  
User Research - Git workflow

AGit, fork-based and new Git workflow, PR creation etc

  
User Research - In the Future

The issue might be inspiring for future design work.

  
User Research - Labels

Active research about Labels

  
User Research - Moderation

Moderation Featuers for Admins are undergoing active User Research

  
User Research - Needs Input

Use this label to let the User Research team know their input is requested.

  
User research - Notifications/Dashboard

Research on how users should know what to do next.

  
User Research - Repo creation

Active research about the New Repo dialog.

  
User Research - Repo Units

The repo sections, disabling them and the "Add more" button.

  
User Research - security

   
User Research - Settings (in-app)

How to structure in-app settings in the future?

No labels
404
Accessibility
Blog post
Documentation
Internationalisation
User research - Accessibility
User research - Blocked
User research - community
User research - Config (instance)
User research - Errors
User Research - Filters
User Research - Git workflow
User Research - In the Future
User Research - Labels
User Research - Moderation
User Research - Needs Input
User research - Notifications/Dashboard
User Research - Repo creation
User Research - Repo Units
User Research - security
User Research - Settings (in-app)
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
forgejo/website!559
No description provided.